Click here to return to home page
Home -  Auctions -  Chat -  Classifieds -  Digest -  eZines -  Find Maltese Love -  Forums -  Free Email
Games -  Horoscopes -  Money Channel -  News -  People Finder -  Photo Gallery -  Search Malta Poll
Malta Postcards -  Online Store -  Sports -  Surnames -  Tell a Friend -  Travel Channel -  Weather
    Home > eZine > Sinatra - a fan's perspective

by Randolph Magri-Overend

A legend died on Thursday 14 May 1998. On a day when Jakarta burned, when Netanyahu and Arafat still haggled over 4 percent of occupied Israeli territory, when Seinfeld broadcast his last TV show to an adulating American audience, when John Coombs and Chris Corrigan were at loggerheads over the Australian waterfront, he died in Palm Springs, California. It was 10.50 pm. Francis Albert Sinatra was 82.

The obituaries sounded the same. Some had been written weeks in advance. A column or two, or even a page. About a man's life. All the facts correct - clinical - recounting scandals, achievements and dates. Eulogies appeared from those who knew him. Or knew of him. Or were indifferent to him. It all read like a business reference.

But Sinatra had only one reference worth recording. His voice. Without it, he was nothing. With it, he was the intimate of Presidents, Princes and Queens. He had conquered the world and yet owed the world a living. He lived because 'life was worth livin' and death was a pain in the arse!' His ups and downs are well documented. Problem is, he lived in an age hungry for news and living his way was sometimes incompatible with his indiscretions. The more he bucked the system, the more he advertised his presence, the more the fans wanted more. Sinatra was communal property. Living in the late 20th century is like living in a 14th century hamlet - people want to come and use the facilities. They feel entitled. Except for the last decade and a half, the voice has always been in fine fettle. He had a few hiccups in the middle fifties, but his problems were more a case of excess than lack of artistry. Living in a hamlet was a cross even Sinatra had to bear.

The voice did change, however. Gone was the sweet legato of the war years and the Harry James/Tommy Dorsey big band arrangements. He had earned the right to dominate. It was a harsher voice, more bass than baritone. More punchy and slick. Nelson Riddle was the arranger of swing, and albums with a single theme swung all the way to the cash registers.

Even with the advent of rock 'n roll, Sinatra survived. Adulation had become tempered with common sense. The fans were mellower. Middle age had swung Sinatra's talents to the big screen while, round the corner, Las Vegas beckoned. With maturity came personal status. Favours were sought by presidents, by parties keen to utilise his web of influence. He had achieved an ambition. He was a pawn with power.

He continued to swing and tour. His farewell concerts rivalled Melba's last stands. Everywhere he went made news. Australia was no different. The 1974 controversy over the standard of journalism was a drop in the ocean compared to previous outbursts. It was like a dog chasing its own tail. The bigger the conflagration, the bigger the news, the bigger the goading, the bigger the conflagration...

His last albums were the two Duet CDs. A final fling before the final curtain. But fans felt cheated. The supporting cast included echo chambers and younger partners. They did not even share the same studio. Sinatra had come full circle. He'd started by singing solo in packed clubs for peanuts and finished singing duets by himself for a fortune. Who cares? The voice still lives.




E-mail to Randolph Magri-Overend: ibmar@zipworld.com.au









  
Random Link   -    What's New   -    What's Cool   -    Top Rated
Copyright © Terranet Ltd. all rights reserved. Disclaimer

Advertise on Search Malta